Learning XBRL-based Reporting: PROOF Verification Using Seattle Method (Prototype)

This is a prototype dashboard of PROOF reports with incremental steps of verification performed. This set of reports helps one understand that verification steps cannot simply be ingored. The following is a summary of validation results for each report:

# Entity
Identifier		 Economic
Entity Name		 View
Report		 Checked By Double Check XBRL Syntax
Validation		 Roll Up
Computations		 XBRL Formula
Computations		 Model
Structure		 FAC Consistency
Crosschecks		 Type/Subtype
Associations		 Disclosure
Mechanics		 Reporting
Checklist		 Other System
Constraints
1 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No XBRL verification, no other verification) PROOF
2 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (With XBRL verification, no XBRL calculations verification, no XBRL Formulas verification, no other verification) PROOF
3 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No XBRL formulas, no model structure, no fundamental accounting concepts, no type-subtype, no disclosure mechanics, no reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
4 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No model structure, no fundamental accounting concepts, no type-subtype, no disclosure mechanics, no reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
5 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No fundamental accounting concepts, no type-subtype, no disclosure mechanics, no reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
6 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No type-subtype, no disclosure mechanics, no reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
7 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No disclosure mechanics, no reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
8 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (No reporting checklist Verification) PROOF
9 GH259400TOMPUOLS65II (With Full Battery of Seattle Method Verification) PROOF